44
EXPRESSÕES DE MICROAGRESSÕES DIRIGIDAS A MULHERES
NOCONTEXTO DO SISTEMA DE SAÚDE: UMA ABORDAGEM
BASEADA EM INCIDENTES CRÍTICOS
1
EXPRESSIONS OF MICROAGGRESSIONS AGAINST WOMEN
INTHEHEALTHCARE CONTEXT: A CRITICAL INCIDENT APPROACH
Elena Piccinelli
2
, Sara Martinho
3
, Christin-Melanie Vauclair
4
PSIQUE • EISSN 21834806 • VOLUME XVI • ISSUE FASCÍCULO 1
1
ST
JANUARY JANEIRO  30
TH
JUNE JUNHO 2020 PP. 4464
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26619/2183-4806.XVI.1.3
Submited on April, 2020
Submetido em abril, 2020
Resumo
Objetivo. Os pacientes pertencentes a minorias sociais podem ser expostos arias formas
de discriminação no contexto de cuidados de saúde. A investigação pvia nesta área não tem
dado especial atenção às manifestações de microagressões dirigidas às mulheres e ao papel das
identidades interseccionais. O presente estudo tem como objetivo reaar os temas subjacentes às
manifestações de microagressões vividas por diversas mulheres em Portugal.
Método. Recorrendo ao modelo de entrevista baseado na Técnica de Incidentes Críticos (Fla-
nagan, 1954), entrevistaram-se 17 mulheres a propósito das microagressões vividas no contexto
de cuidados de saúde. Entre as identidades interseccionais, algumas mulheres pertenciam a gru-
pos minoritários baseados na etnicidade, LGB e diversidade funcional.
Resultados. Foram identificados 17 temas relativos às microagressões, cinco dos quais diri-
gidos às mulheres no geral, e sete dirigidos às mulheres com identidades interseccionais específi-
cas. Outros quatro temas refletiram atitudes microagressivas dos profissionais de saúde dirigidas
a pacientes no geral, sem relação com o género ou à pertença a outras minorias sociais, e um tema
foi criado para descrever microagreses sistémicas.
Conclusões. Alguns dos temas encontrados foram relacionados com microagressões que as
mulheres vivem no dia-a-dia, sendo agravados pela disparidade de poder entre profissionais de
saúde e pacientes. Outros temas pareceram ser específicos do contexto de saúde e relacionados
com a falta de abordagens centradas no/a paciente.
Palavras-chave: Microagressões, Cuidados de Saúde, Mulheres, Interseccionalidade, Incidentes Críticos
1
Este trabalho foi apoiado pelas subvenções atribuídas aos segundo e terceiro autores pela Fundação Portuguesa para a Ciên-
cia e Tecnologia (PD/BD/135343/2017 e IF/00346/2014)2014). This work was supported by the grants awarded to the second
and third authors by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (PD/BD/135343/2017 and IF/00346/2014)
2
Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, ISCTE-IUL, Lisboa, Portugal. elena_piccinelli@iscte-iul.pt
3
Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, ISCTE-IUL, CIS-IUL, Lisboa, Portugal. soqmo@iscte-iul.pt
4
Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, ISCTE-IUL, CIS-IUL, Lisboa, Portugal. Melanie.Vauclair@iscte-iul.pt
45
PSIQUE • e-ISSN 2183-4806 • Volume XVI • Issue Fascículo 1 • 1
st
january janeiro-30
th
june junho 2020 pp. 44-64
Elena Piccinelli, Sara Martinho, Christin-Melanie Vauclair
Abstract
Purpose Patients belonging to social minorities can be exposed to various forms of
discrimination in the healthcare context. Previous research in this domain has overlooked
expressions of microaggressions against women and the role of intersectional identities. This
study aims to uncover the themes that underly the experience of microaggressions by diverse
women in Portugal.
Methods Using an interview model based on the Critical Incident Technique (Flanagan,
1954) 17 women were interviewed about their microaggression experiences in the healthcare
setting. Among those with an intersectional identity, social minority membership was also based
on ethnicity, LGB sexual orientation and functional diversity.
Results A total of 17 microaggressive themes were retrieved, five of which were found to
be related to microaggressions towards women in general and a total of seven were unique for
women with specific intersectional identities. Another four themes reflected providers’ general
attitudes towards patients without being related to gender or any intersectional minority group,
and one theme described systemic microaggressions.
Conclusion Some of the retrieved themes reflect microaggressions that women seem to
experience in their everyday life but that are exacerbated by the health provider-patient power
disparity. Some themes appear to be specific to the healthcare context and related to providers
lack of patient-centeredness.
Keywords: Microaggressions, Healthcare, Women, Intersectionality, Critical Incidents
Discrimination in the form of racism, sexism, heterosexism or ableism have taken new forms
of expressions over the past decades. While blatant manifestations seem to be almost disap-
pearing, subtle forms of discrimination have been emerging and becoming more prominent in
many Western societies (Dovidio & Gaertner, 2000). To date, a large share of social psychologi-
cal research on subtle discrimination focuses on perpetrators to better understand their biases,
stimulated by the insight that anti-prejudice norms in Western societies changed the expression
of prejudice from overt to covert, especially in regard to race relations in the United States. This
modern form of race prejudice has been labelled in various ways such as symbolic racism (Sears,
1988), aversive racism (Dovidio & Gaertner, 2004), racial ambivalence (Katz, Wackenhut, & Hass,
1986), or modern racism (McConahay, 1983; Pettigrew, 1989). Similar conceptual developments
occurred in the area of sexism such as ambivalent sexism (Glick & Fiske, 2001), modern sexism
(Swim, Aikin, Hall, & Hunter, 1995), and neosexism (Tougas, Brown, Beaton, & Joly, 1995).
More recently, a new research paradigm within the area of counselling and clinical psychol-
ogy has emerged, focusing on the targets and examining how they experience subtle forms of
discrimination (Sue et al., 2007). Within this paradigm, subtle discrimination has been framed
under the label of microaggressions, which are defined as the slights, insults, invalidations or
indignities that are directed at minority, marginalized and discriminated groups and which com-
municate derogatory and hostile messages (Sue, 2010). They are often delivered by well-inten-
tioned individuals who are not aware of the discriminatory implicit message they are sending.
46
PSIQUE • e-ISSN 2183-4806 • Volume XVI • Issue Fascículo 1 • 1
st
january janeiro-30
th
june junho 2020 pp. 44-64
Expressões de Microagressões Dirigidas a Mulheres no Contexto do Sistema de Saúde:
Uma Abordagem Baseada em Incidentes Críticos
Within this framework, many authors (Capodilupo et al., 2010; Nadal et al., 2015; Sue, 2010) have
conducted seminal qualitative research and showed that there are different microaggressive
themes reflecting the experience of various social minority groups. Some of these themes tap
into stereotypes and prejudices as already identified in the social psychological literature that
focuses on the perpetrators´ perspective (e.g., benevolent sexism, Glick & Fiske, 2001). Yet, other
microaggressive themes seem to tap into basic social categorization and identification processes
(e.g., the theme ´alien in own country´ referring to the ethnic majority´s belief that visible racial/
ethnic minority citizens are foreigners). Hence, microaggressions are multifaceted and there are
still many unknowns, such as how microaggressions are expressed in different societies. More-
over, the issue of intersectionality has recently attracted increased attention in the literature but
rarely been examined in regard to microaggressions. There is an urgent need for more studies to
be conducted outside the United States (US) in order to better understand what kinds of micro-
aggressions particular social minorities experience in a specific socio-cultural context and life
domain. This study aims to address these research gaps by examining the type of microaggres-
sions that women belonging to multiple social minorities experience in the healthcare context
in Portugal.
Microaggressions in the Healthcare Context
Microaggressions have been studied in various domains to date (e.g., counselling, work-
place) with the healthcare context being a highly relevant one because health providers
occupy a position of social power and authority and patients find themselves in a situation of
heightened vulnerability (Cruz et al., 2019; Saha et al., 2008). This power disparity is exacer-
bated when patients belong to socially disadvantaged minority groups (Vissandjée et al., 2001)
creating ideal conditions for the expression of well-intentioned but microaggressive messages.
Previous research has already shown that microaggressions can have harmful consequences
on targets’ health and psychological wellbeing (Nadal et al., 2014; Nadal et al., 2016). More-
over, the experience of microaggressions in the healthcare context can also be regarded as
lacking patient-centeredness which has shown to be harmful regarding treatment adherence,
patients’ trust and satisfaction and general medical outcomes (Taylor, 2009). Hence, experienc-
ing microaggressions in the healthcare domain may also jeopardize minority members´ health
outcomes rendering it a topic of utmost relevance.
Previous qualitative research on microaggressions in the healthcare context mainly focused
on uncovering the microaggressive themes as experienced by minorities belonging to one par-
ticular socially disadvantaged group (Almond, 2017; Cruz et al., 2019; Feagin & Bennefield, 2014;
Frankset al., 2005; Hobson, 2001). Only very few studies focused on microaggressions experi-
enced by women in the healthcare domain. Among the most relevant studies is the one con-
ducted by Smith-Oka (2015). She conducted ethnographic fieldwork to study interactions between
health providers and obstetric patients in Mexico and found that microaggressions in clinical
encounters were related to the following overarching themes: 1) perceptions of suitability for
good motherhood; 2) moralized versions of modern motherhood inscribed on patient bodies; 2)
a priori assumptions about the hypersexuality of low-incomewomen; and 4) clinician frustra-
tion exacerbated by overwork resulting in corporeal violence. Even though this study provides
47
PSIQUE • e-ISSN 2183-4806 • Volume XVI • Issue Fascículo 1 • 1
st
january janeiro-30
th
june junho 2020 pp. 44-64
Elena Piccinelli, Sara Martinho, Christin-Melanie Vauclair
insights into microaggressions experienced by women in medical encounters, it is embedded in
the very specific healthcare context of obstetrics in Mexico.
There is also one recent qualitative study on microaggressions experienced by LGBTQI +
minority members in the medical healthcare context which identified the following themes:
Endorsement of Heteronormative or Gender Normative Culture and Behaviours, Discomfort With
or Disapproval of LGB or Transgender Experience, Environmental Microaggressions and Systemic
Microaggressions (Dean et al., 2016). This study focused generally on sexual orientation, without
specifically considering the experiences of self-identified women. Nevertheless, it provides a
first glimpse into the microaggressive themes that may underly the experiences of LGBTQI+
populations in the healthcare context. Particularly interesting is the theme Systemic Microag-
gressions which “manifest in institutional organization and policy (both de jure and de facto),
including educational programming and curricula, and are closely linked to the lack of diver-
sity trainings for health professionals (Dean et al., 2016). These type of microaggressions go well
beyond interpersonal expressions of biases and point to the larger systemic and structural prob-
lems of discrimination that are engrained in society.
Finally, Snyder et al. (2018) conducted a study in the U.S. on multiracial male and female
patients. They found that microaggressions were driven by health providers making mistaken
assumptions about patients’ ethnic identity, family kinship and income class or degree of edu-
cation based on their physical attributes. They also found that intersectionality was an impor-
tant reason for attributing microaggressions or feelings of awkward encounters in health care
because participants could not attribute them just to race. This is an important finding because
it suggests that intersectionality may be an important issue for the experience of microaggres-
sions. Yet, Snyder et al. (2018) did not further examine how intersectionality may play a role for
the type of microaggressions that their intersectional patients experienced.
Intersectionality has recently become a buzzword in psychology and is well integrated into
feminist writings in the social sciences (Else-Quest & Hyde, 2016). Intersectionality evolved from
Black Feminism and Critical Race Theory and is a theoretical and analytical approach emphasiz-
ing that social experiences are shaped by multiple categories of identity, difference, and inequal-
ity (e.g., gender, race, sexual orientation, disability and others) (Cole, 2009). It can be defined as
the interconnected nature of social categorizations as they apply to a given individual or group,
which create overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination or disadvantage (Oxford
University Press, 2019). In other words, people with different minoritarian identities may not
simply experience discrimination based on the separate social groups they belong to (e.g., rac-
ism or sexism) but they are subjected to specific forms of prejudice related to the intersection of
their identities as is the case of the phenomenon of gendered racism (Lewis & Neville, 2015). This
may expose individuals to microaggressions of a somewhat different nature (Nadal, etal., 2015;
Sue, 2010). For example, Nadal et al. (2015) recently demonstrated that microaggressions towards
people with intersectional identities contain themes that are different to those that have been
established for non-intersectional minorities: women of color described experiences related to
exotization, or ambiguous compliments about their appearance, while lesbian women appeared
to be exposed to gender-based stereotypes related to masculinity.
In this study, we aim to examine microaggressions experienced by women in the health care
context in Portugal by taking into account that intersectional identities can give rise to differ-
ent experiences. We consider that social identities are multifaceted and can include different
48
PSIQUE • e-ISSN 2183-4806 • Volume XVI • Issue Fascículo 1 • 1
st
january janeiro-30
th
june junho 2020 pp. 44-64
Expressões de Microagressões Dirigidas a Mulheres no Contexto do Sistema de Saúde:
Uma Abordagem Baseada em Incidentes Críticos
minoritarian and intersectional identities. Hence, our overall research question is: What type
of microaggressions do women and those with intersectional identities experience in the health
care domain in Portugal? To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that aims to answer
this question in the Portuguese socio-cultural context.
Methods
Participants
Female participants were recruited through personal contacts and via snowball sampling
within the activist community. Participants were deemed eligible if they were activists or highly
committed to social minority causes which was established as an eligibility criterium because
the ability to recognize subtle discriminatory acts, such as microaggressive incidents, should be
greater when women have developed an actively committed identity (Capodilupo et al., 2010;
Downing & Roush, 1985). This approach made it more likely to reach a point of saturation with a
relatively small number of interviews.
The sample was composed of 17 women belonging to different social minorities with 6
self-identifying just as Portuguese women and 11 indicating intersectional identities, i.e. identi-
fying themselves also with a LGB minority group (n=5), or with a specific ethnic minority (n=4),
or as a functionally diverse woman (n=2). Participants’ age ranged from 23 to 59 years (M = 38).
Sixteen of them self-identified with the feminine gender, one participant self-identified with
non-binary gender. All participants had Portuguese nationality, three of them also had a sec-
ond nationality. All participants self-identified as activists and/or feminists. Fourteen of them
defined themselves as ´formal activists´ (meaning that they usually engage in activities with
associations, organizations and other entities that openly work with activism), while three of
them defined themselves as ´informal activists´ (intending activism as an every-day contribu-
tion through interpersonal relations, work activities, research activities, etc.). As activists, partic-
ipants expressed their interest in different forms of activism, such as feminism, ethnic activism,
activism for LGBTQI+ peoples rights, activism for functionally diverse peoples rights, and inter-
sectional forms of activism.
Procedure
Instruments
The development of the semi-structured interview guide relied on previous literature about
microaggressions (e.g., Capodilupo et al., 2010) and discrimination in the health care, as well
as on Flanagans Critical Incident Technique (1954). The latter aims to identify the observation
of human behavior that has critical significance for the target person. Critical incidents refer
to situations which are remembered because they are perceived as problematic, upsetting or
confusing. This makes it a highly suitable method for the identification of microaggressions by
individuals who are highly committed to social minority causes because they are more likely
to appraise and remember situations as critical and as reflecting a subtle form of discrimina-
tion (Capodilupo et al., 2010; Downing & Roush, 1985). The use of this technique can provide the
49
PSIQUE • e-ISSN 2183-4806 • Volume XVI • Issue Fascículo 1 • 1
st
january janeiro-30
th
june junho 2020 pp. 44-64
Elena Piccinelli, Sara Martinho, Christin-Melanie Vauclair
researcher with a rich description of the microaggressive incident, according to the perspective
and to the subjective reality of the interviewee. The subjectivity of the experience and apprais-
als of microaggressive incidents is a key element of the microaggressions framework (Sue, 2010).
This technique also offers the opportunity to construct short vignettes that can be used for train-
ing purposes to sensitize enactors of microaggressions and illustrate how they are experienced
by the targets. Critical incidents have been used in a wide range of disciplines, such as Nursing,
Medicine, and Psychology. In particular Intercultural Psychology has made use of critical inci-
dents for training purposes to sensitize individuals about specific issues, and to trigger empathy,
raise awareness and stimulate critical thinking (Herfst et al., 2008). Yet, to the best of our knowl-
edge this technique has not been used to extract and illustrate microaggressive themes in the
healthcare context.
The interview guide started with a definition of microaggressions and some very general
examples. At the end of the introduction, the interviewer used the critical incident technique
(Flanagan, 1954) to elicit concrete accounts of experiences with microaggressions directed at the
interviewee or other people that had occurred in the healthcare context. Open-ended questions
followed in order to probe into the details of the incident and to facilitate the remembrance of
the situation of microaggression (Gremler, 2004) (e.g., the actors involved, the emotions felt, the
perceived cause of the incident, the psychological and practical consequences, etc.). The memory
of one incident often triggers the memory of similar incidents (Edvardsson & Roos, 2001). Hence,
the same set of questions was repeated for each incident described. At the end of the interview,
questions about personal details (age, gender, identification with social minorities, details about
their engagement as activists) were asked.
A pilot study was conducted in order to test the interview guide. Four women participated in
the pilot and were given instructions to recall microaggressive incidents either before or during
the interview took place. Participants who had received the instructions before the interview
remembered about twice as many incidents of microaggressions and were able to provide more
details in their description than those who received the instruction during the interview. For this
reason, it was decided to provide all participants of the main study with the instruction prior to
the interview.
Data collection
Interviews were conducted in Portugal, between March and May 2019 and followed the ethi-
cal principles and code of conduct for psychologists as stipulated by the American Psychological
Association (APA). The informed consent ensured that participation was voluntary, anonymous
and confidential. The principle of saturation
(Saunders et al., 2018) was reached after interview-
ing 17 participants. Out of 17 interviews, 12 were conducted face-to-face, three were conducted
on video-call and two via telephone. The interviews’ duration lasted on average 27 minutes. All
interviews were conducted by the same interviewer, in Portuguese, were audio-recorded, and
transcribed verbatim. Quotes reported in the results section were translated from Portuguese to
English.
Data Analysis
A thematic analysis was conducted with NVivo to identify specific themes within the data to
help understand the meanings of the microaggressive incidents (Braun et al., 2018). The chosen
50
PSIQUE • e-ISSN 2183-4806 • Volume XVI • Issue Fascículo 1 • 1
st
january janeiro-30
th
june junho 2020 pp. 44-64
Expressões de Microagressões Dirigidas a Mulheres no Contexto do Sistema de Saúde:
Uma Abordagem Baseada em Incidentes Críticos
unit of coding consisted of segments of conversation that represented a single message or a dis-
tinguishable feature relevant for each created node. The length of these units differed and was
determined by the coder, a valid approach when the analysis is conducted on semi-structure
interviews containing open-ended questions with free-flowing text data (Kurasaki, 2000). For
our analysis, we first inductively identified and labelled categories of microaggressive incidents
based on specific underlying themes. The coded segments were first categorized deductively,
i.e. based on themes that had already been established in the literature about microaggressions.
When this was not possible, we created new themes considering the social psychological litera-
ture about stereotyping and discrimination. A total of 17 microaggressive themes were identified
with this approach which can be seen in Table 1.
Peer debriefing was repeatedly done during the different phases of the study. Codes and
coding procedures were reviewed and discussed within the research team to mitigate biases due
to the researcher´s subjective judgments (Coutinho, 2008). Moreover, a third researcher reviewed
the coding of two interviews, which were randomly selected (20% of all collected data) and stated
whether they agreed or disagreed with each code.
TABLE1
Microaggressive Themes
Microaggressive themes Frequencies Denition
Women in general
1. Ascription of inferiority
8 Related to the belief that women are too emotional and hypochondriac, and not
able to decide for their health neither to understand their own health issues.
2. Assumption of traditional
gender roles
1 Related to the belief that women should follow the gender roles prescribed by
society, especially in the context of family care.
3. Moralization
4 Microaggressions related to this theme were found to be triggered when
women were believed to be breaking moral norms related to feminine sexuality
and pregnancy.
4. Female objectication
6 Includes any attitude that treats women like objects, depriving them of their
value as human beings.
5. Pain endurance
4 Related to the belief that women have a lower pain endurance, are more
sensitive to pain and more willing to report it.
LGB women
6. Assumption of abnormality
3 Related to the belief that LGB women are socially deviant or sick, and that
homosexuality, bisexuality, transsexuality and intersexuality are something
unnatural and abnormal
7. Endorsement of
heteronormativity
5 Refers to providers’ assumptions a priori that their patients are heterosexual.
Ethnic minority women
8. Second-class citizenship
5 Refers to the treatment of women belonging to ethnic minorities as inferior or
as “lesser persons”
9. Exotization
2 Related to the sexualization and objectication of black women and their
bodies and to assumptions on hyper-fertility, sexual promiscuity and lack of
family planning
10. Invisibility
2 Refers to the invisibilization of women belonging to ethnic minorities
51
PSIQUE • e-ISSN 2183-4806 • Volume XVI • Issue Fascículo 1 • 1
st
january janeiro-30
th
june junho 2020 pp. 44-64
Elena Piccinelli, Sara Martinho, Christin-Melanie Vauclair
Microaggressive themes Frequencies Denition
Functionally diverse women
11. Desexualization
1 Refers to the belief that functionally diverse women are asexual beings
12. Insensitivity
4 Includes any attitude of insensitivity and lack of empathy towards people with
functional diversity and their condition
Patients as a disadvantaged group
13. Attitude of superciality
3 Refers to providers’ attitudes of superciality during consultations.
14. Lack of sensitivity-empathy
3 Refers to providers’ lack of sensitivity or empathy for patients’ health condition,
illness or emotional status.
15. Reduction to body parts
2 It refers to the treatment of patients as objects, as mere bodies with illnesses,
without their own feelings, willingness, personality and history.
16. Paternalization
2 Health providers often assume a position of authority towards their patients,
lacking in eective communication and invalidating their experiences.
17. Systemic Microaggressions
16 Occurs at the systemic level, being embedded both in formal and informal
practices, explicit or subtle norms of organizational structures.
Results
Microaggressions against Women in General
Ascription of Inferiority
Many women mentioned situations in which health providers treated them as unable to
understand their clinical conditions and that health providers claimed them to be highly anxious
or hypochondriac underscoring their perceived weakness and inferiority.
And he always has those phrases that cost me a little to listen to because he says, ´Marta*
is very anxious, Marta is always very anxious´” [IP 2, 34 years; *Name was changed]
Prescription of Traditional Gender Roles
Interviewees recalled situations of interaction with health providers in which their social
roles as women, mothers and caregivers were taken for granted.
“During the period of hospitalization [of my recent-born daughter] I rarely received
information about my baby. Information was always given to the father, [] And there
was this issue, that the mother, clearly, the mother is a caregiver and the father is the
decider. [].” [IP 11, 33 years]
Moralization
Participants reported that health providers assumed microaggressive attitudes in situations
in which patients were perceived to break moral norms related to feminine sexuality and preg-
nancy.
52
PSIQUE • e-ISSN 2183-4806 • Volume XVI • Issue Fascículo 1 • 1
st
january janeiro-30
th
june junho 2020 pp. 44-64
Expressões de Microagressões Dirigidas a Mulheres no Contexto do Sistema de Saúde:
Uma Abordagem Baseada em Incidentes Críticos
“Once, when I was a kid; I was 12 years old, [], and I suddenly started having a hip pain,
and at the time I didn’t know what it was. []. So, I was in a lot of pain [] and had to go
to the doctor and the nurse... [] The nurse was so, she was mean to me. I didn’t know
what it was, I was still a virgin at the time, and she said to me: ´Ah, this is what you get
from the men you sleep with.´” [IP 10, 49 years]
Female Objectification
Participants expressed feeling treated like objects, being deprived of their value as human
beings. For example, many women described the feeling of being treated as reproduction
machines during maternity and childbirth, particularly in medical specialties as gynecology
and obstetrics.
“I think I was under 13, like 12 and 13 years old, and whenever I was wearing a bra, I had
a lot of pain. [] And I remember asking that question [to the gynecologist]. [] And the
answer I got was... [] ´wear a sports bra on ordinary days and wear a prettier bra when
you go out for parties which can be seen” [IP 6, 23 years]
Pain endurance
Many women described situations in which health providers treated them as if they were
destined to suffer and endure pain, physically and psychologically, during their whole life.
And when you say youre in pain [during childbirth], all they do is to say, and repeat it
over and over again: ´Hang in there. Being a mother is like this. That’s our cross. What
did you think it would be like?” [IP 9, 45 years]
Microaggressions against Women with Intersectional Identities
Ethnic Minority Women
Second-Class Citizenship. Ethnic minority women reported situations in which they were
treated as less worthy and less deserving which made them feel inferior and discriminated
against.
“I’m Indian, and I have a complicated name. The first name, Lisa*, is simple, but the others
are quite complicated. [] when I arrived in the office of the doctor or the provider, there
would always be a… how to say… condescending comment in relation to my name.” [IP
8, 35 years; *Name was changed]
Exotization. Women of color recalled incidents in which health providers made assumptions
about their style, attractiveness and standards of beauty. Other participants described situations
53
PSIQUE • e-ISSN 2183-4806 • Volume XVI • Issue Fascículo 1 • 1
st
january janeiro-30
th
june junho 2020 pp. 44-64
Elena Piccinelli, Sara Martinho, Christin-Melanie Vauclair
which expressed the belief that women coming from developing countries are hyper-fertile, sex-
ually unbridled and suffer from lack of family planning.
“[] He made a comment that... [] It must have been about my eyes, the color of my
eyes... Something like that. As if it was surprising because Cape Verdeans aren’t usually
so beautiful. ´The eyes are so beautiful; the skin color is so beautiful´.” [IP 2, 34 years]
“Being pregnant, she experienced many situations, and being Brazilian... many situa-
tions related to be judgment of the reproductive capacity of Brazilian women. There was
a doctor who told her ‹You Brazilians can’t stay still; youre always having kids. ›” [IP 10,
49 years]
Invisibility. Ethnic minority women described the feeling of being invisible, unworthy of
recognition powerless and overlooked.
“First, we spent hours in the hallway of the emergency, she [the grandmother] was com-
pletely delirious from fever... And in this situation, yes, I felt invisible []. I believe that
if I was a man [] I would have had another type of attention. And, also, because were
Indian.” [IP 8, 35 years]
“This happens many times, regardless of being or not in health situations. [...] But I remem-
ber being at the emergency department, at the hospital, and I remember being a at the
entrance, to check in, (maybe it was the day of childbirth, I don’t remember), there was
a couple and they were being attended, and there was no one else to be attended, only
me. [] And they were attended, and when I advanced, the nurse decided at that time
to staple all the papers she had and go to the doctor or whoever was in the other room.
I think it was on the day of childbirth... I was feeling some pain and it was exacerbating
the situation even more... [] And I actually felt invisible and I had to do something, I had
to be angry at her and to say that not even in situations of emergency people are careful
enough to understand and to be, once more, sensitive. ” [IP 2, 34 years]
LGB Minority Women
Assumptions of Abnormality. LGB women reported being treated as socially deviant, as if
homo-, bi-, trans-, and intersexuality were something unnatural and abnormal.
“I know this lesbian girl that went to a gynecological consultation. And the doctor, it was
a woman, suggested her to use some contraceptives, and she [the girl] said she didn’t
need to. The doctor was shocked. And the girl said ´No, it is because I like women, I am
lesbian, I don’t need contraceptives´. The doctor advised her to go see a psychologist [].
[IP 6, 23 years]
Endorsement of Heteronormativity. Many LGB women recalled incidents in which health
providers assumed a priori that their patients were heteronormative.
54
PSIQUE • e-ISSN 2183-4806 • Volume XVI • Issue Fascículo 1 • 1
st
january janeiro-30
th
june junho 2020 pp. 44-64
Expressões de Microagressões Dirigidas a Mulheres no Contexto do Sistema de Saúde:
Uma Abordagem Baseada em Incidentes Críticos
“The doctors great concern was – it was a female doctor – [] which contraceptive meth-
ods I used. When I said I didn’t use any, [] she gave me almost a sermon saying: ´you
will get pregnant´.” [IP 3, 59 years]
Functionally Diverse Women
Desexualization. Women with functional diversity reported situations in which their sexu-
ality and sexual identity were ignored, and they were treated as asexual beings, devoid of sexual
needs and desires.
“[] it happened to me in a gynecology consultation, when I had a complicated problem...
the problem had a simple solution, but their assumption was like ´Ah, it doesn’t matter,
as you don’t need to have it [internal reproductive organs], we take everything out. Since
you won’t have to [] reproduce...´ []. They wanted to take it all out, do a general hys-
terectomy and remove all the organs to solve the problem.” [IP 12, 52 years]
Insensitivity Towards Functionally Diverse People. Interviewees described health pro-
viders’ attitudes of insensitivity towards people with functional diversity and their condition.
[Microaggression experienced by a woman on a wheelchair] “The other day I went to
do an echocardiogram. And there was a big stretcher, something that you can’t just put
the chair underneath it to let me get on it, and I asked the lady how I was going to get on
the stretcher. And she put a footstool next to me, for me to get on the stretcher.” [IP 12, 52
years,]
Microaggressions against Patients as a Disadvantaged Group
Unexpectedly, participants reported some microaggressive incidents as not being related
to their gender or to their intersectional identities, but to providers’ attitudes of superficiality,
insensitivity, objectification, and paternalization towards patients in general. These microag-
gressions are described below.
Attitude of Superficiality
Participants referred to attitudes of superficiality during the consultations.
“[] A few years ago, I went to a dermatologist []; we had a scheduled appointment
and she arrived half an hour late, the consultation lasted ten minutes and I paid – at the
moment – €80. And she wasn’t looking at the problem I had on my skin, she just passed
the prescription.” [IP 2, 34 years]
55
PSIQUE • e-ISSN 2183-4806 • Volume XVI • Issue Fascículo 1 • 1
st
january janeiro-30
th
june junho 2020 pp. 44-64
Elena Piccinelli, Sara Martinho, Christin-Melanie Vauclair
Lack of Sensitivity/Empathy
Participants reported incidents in which they, or the patient in the situation, did not feel
understood, or being treated without any sensitivity or empathy for their health condition, illness
or emotional status.
“I also have a family member who had an ectopic pregnancy, so the baby got stuck in the
fallopian tube and did not grow up. And it was a baby she wanted very much, it was the
second child, but she really wanted to have a second child. And the doctor just said to
her: ´now you probably won’t have children anymore´.” [IP 1, 27 years]
Reduction to Body Parts
Participants described the feeling of being reduced to the body parts to be treated, without
consideration of their own feelings, willingness, personality and history (Bernard et al., 2015). 
“[] she [the doctor] started to do a pap-test, but in a way... I felt very mistreated and did
not show any reaction [] She talked a lot with the intern and little with me, so even
when the intern wasn’t there, she spoke less to me and looked more at the computer. []
And then, when she was doing the pap-test, she told me to undress from the waist down
and she didn’t put a towel on top of me, or anything else. [..]. And I had no ability to react,
I felt very exposed, because I was there, naked, the intern was a man, and she had no
consideration at all.” [IP 10, 49 years]
Paternalization of Patients
Many participants described situations in which health providers assumed an authoritarian
position failing in facilitating a shared decision-making process and invalidating their experi-
ences.
“I felt I had an infection of the urinary tract. It was not the first time, and, as women, I
think we know when we have a urinary infection, we recognize the symptoms, etc. And
I got there and said I have a urinary infection, and the doctor had that reaction that was
like ´I’m going to tell you whether you have one, let’s see´. [IP 15, 31 years]
Systemic Microaggressions
During the data analysis, we also retrieved microaggressions that reflect discriminatory
processes systematically built into organizational structures. Systemic discrimination is perpe-
trated through established practices and procedures, including both specific formal rules and
informal practices embedded in organizational norms, which have become “part of the system
(Beck et al., 2002).
“I had a postpartum complication and had to be hospitalized in the intensive care. And
meanwhile the two babies – they were twins – had to go to neonatology because it was
56
PSIQUE • e-ISSN 2183-4806 • Volume XVI • Issue Fascículo 1 • 1
st
january janeiro-30
th
june junho 2020 pp. 44-64
Expressões de Microagressões Dirigidas a Mulheres no Contexto do Sistema de Saúde:
Uma Abordagem Baseada em Incidentes Críticos
the only place where they could stay. [...] In this context, Sofia* [the partner] experienced
some unpleasant situations, for example they referred to her as ´father´ [] The mother
was me who had the babies, and there can only be one mother and one father, so she
was the father. Or in the sense that initially only the parents can enter… mother and
father, into the neonatology ward, so they tried to ban her access because she was nei-
ther mother nor father.” [IP 7, 38 years; *Name was changed]
A specific example is represented by physical barriers that impede people with functional
diversity (e.g., in a wheelchair) to access specific areas.
“The medical offices, in this case within the gynecology services, are all structured for
women who have a normal mobility. I cant get on a stretcher in a gynecological consul-
tation in a public hospital or any hospital.” [IP 12, 52 years]
Discussion
Microaggressions in the healthcare context are a subtle, but potentially harmful phenome-
non by being unconsciously perpetrated by health providers towards patients. The main purpose
of this study was to conduct a qualitative analysis in order to identify, analyze and understand
microaggressive incidents towards women in the healthcare context by taking into account that
women may belong to various minority groups and experience specific microaggression related
to their intersectional identities. This study identified five themes based on microaggressive
attitudes towards women in general and seven themes reflecting intersectional microaggres-
sive incidents (for ethnic minority women, LGB women or functionally diverse women). Unex-
pectedly, we also found four microaggressive themes specifically related to providers’ attitudes
towards patients without being related to other forms of discrimination. Moreover, there was
one theme that reflected the disadvantages and inequalities expressed in microaggressions of
systemic nature. In the light of these results, there are four key contributions of our study to the
literature.
First, most of the themes presented in this study match the already existing literature about
sexist, racist, heterosexist, ableist and intersectional microaggressions, which validates the
themes identified here, but also shows that the social relations in the healthcare context are
subjected to the same discriminatory mechanisms as in other contexts. This is of great relevance
because the experience of microaggressions has been linked to impaired mental health and psy-
chological wellbeing (Nadal et al., 2014; Nadal, et al., 2016), and health care professionals may
unconsciously add to the targets´ cumulative experience of subtle discrimination which is par-
ticularly damaging for patients because they find themselves in a context of heightened vulner-
ability. In this context, the themes assumption of inferiority and traditional gender roles which can
be found in the literature about gender microaggressions, are also conceptually similar to the con-
cept of benevolent sexism proposed by Glick and Fiske.
Their conceptualization of hostile sexism
fits well with our microaggressive theme moralization which refers to the belief that womens
sexuality is dangerous to men and to the current social hierarchy (Glick & Fiske, 2001). The theme
57
PSIQUE • e-ISSN 2183-4806 • Volume XVI • Issue Fascículo 1 • 1
st
january janeiro-30
th
june junho 2020 pp. 44-64
Elena Piccinelli, Sara Martinho, Christin-Melanie Vauclair
moralization, as well as female objectification, reflect the themes uncovered in Smith-Oka´s (2015)
study, yet are somewhat different to what she has found (Smith-Oka, 2015). This may be because
the focus on obstetrics in her study narrows the perspective only to the experiences of pregnant
women, which can be considered an especially vulnerable group. Interestingly, we found that
these same contents were present in microaggressions experienced by non-pregnant women,
being still particularly related to sexual and reproductive health. In particular, Smith-Oka (2015)
found that providers’ attitudes of moralization were mainly related to providers’ perception of
their patients capacity of being good mothers; we found these same attitudes to be related to
the breaking of moral norms about female sexuality. She also found the theme of female objecti-
fication to manifest in the form of corporal microaggressions, which translate in physical forms
of obstetric violence; in our study, we included in this theme those incidents, non-physically
violent, in which women reported to be treated like reproductive machines. Finally, Smith-Oka
(2015) found some microaggressions to be related to providers’ assumptions regarding patients
unbridled sexuality: we found this theme to be recurrent in ethnic minority women as a form of
exotization.
Second, this study suggests that there are some microaggressive themes that are character-
ized by stereotypes specific to the healthcare context, and that are not present in other con-
texts. The theme pain endurance, which has already been identified in studies about Gender Role
Expectations of Pain (GREP) according to which women are commonly considered less able to
endure pain and more willing to report it (Robinson et al., 2001; Wandner et al., 2012), was never
considered in the literature about microaggressions in healthcare before.
Similarly, issues of
desexualization and insensitivity towards functionally diverse women have already been flagged
before, but never in the framework of microaggressions (Keller & Galgay, 2010; Scullion, 1999).
Third, the focus of this study on intersectionality has allowed us to analyze the experience
of women belonging to multiple minoritarian groups. On the one side, participants with intersec-
tional identities were able to identify microaggressions directed to the specific intersections of
their identities. In other words, women belonging to an ethnic minority were found to experience
certain forms of microaggressions, different from those experienced by LGB women and func-
tionally diverse women, which in turn described microaggressive experiences unique to their
groups. Previous research has already pointed to the issue of “gendered racism
(Lewis & Neville,
2015) and ethnic minority women experiences of invisibilization, exclusion and isolation, biased
compliments on appearance, and assumption of inferior status (Nadal et al., 2015; Sue, 2010). This
has also emerged in the themes of this study (see second-class citizenship, invisibility and exoti-
zation). Furthermore, past studies found that LGBTQI+ women experience microaggressions in
the healthcare setting in the form of health providers’ heteronormative assumptions (Dean et
al., 2016). Previous research focusing on patient-centeredness have also emphasized that among
clinicians, there is lack of knowledge of LGBTQI+ health needs (Lee & Kanji, 2017; Smith & Tur-
ell, 2017). Lesbian mothers can be considered a particularly vulnerable category, being likely to
experience forms of heterosexist invalidation and exclusion (Dahl et al., 2013; Gregg, 2018). All of
these issues have also been identified in the themes of this study (see assumptions of abnormality,
endorsement of heteronormativity). On the other hand, participants with intersectional identi-
ties were also found to experience microaggressions uniquely related to their gender identity
as women (themes described under microaggressions towards women in general in the results).
58
PSIQUE • e-ISSN 2183-4806 • Volume XVI • Issue Fascículo 1 • 1
st
january janeiro-30
th
june junho 2020 pp. 44-64
Expressões de Microagressões Dirigidas a Mulheres no Contexto do Sistema de Saúde:
Uma Abordagem Baseada em Incidentes Críticos
These results are relevant because they highlight that some themes transversally characterize
the experience of all women, while others are specific to the intersection of particular identities.
Fourth, we found that some of the microaggressions did not rely on sexist, heterosexist, racist
or ableist beliefs, but on patients as a disadvantaged group. Power disparities between patients
and providers allow us to define patients as a social minority due to differences in status, power,
rank and privileges (Tajfel, 1982). By considering microaggressions towards patients in general,
we propose that microaggressions may be related not only to social stereotypes, but also to other
types of mistreatment related to power disparities. The themes of attitudes of superficiality and
lack of sensitivity/empathy can also be regarded as lacking patient-centeredness (Taylor, 2009)
which may jeopardize treatment adherence and trust in the health care provider, and, therefore,
ultimately patients´ health outcomes. On the other hand, the issue of reducing to body parts and
patronizing patients may be exacerbated by sexist beliefs that objectify and patronize females
in particular. Hence, while some themes might also occur with male patients, others imply an
exacerbation of subtle discrimination for female patients due to their overlap with sexist themes
while yet other themes reflect uniquely female issues (e.g., moralization) or issues related to
women with intersectional identities (e.g., exotization).
A last group of microaggressive themes was related to systemic microaggressions. In this con-
text, an approach focused on the macro level may allow to identify and understand the systems
of privilege and power, social hierarchies, symbolic systems and cultural imageries on which
microaggressive incidents rely (Embrick et al., 2017). Systemic microaggressions have already
been identified in previous studies and linked to deficits in institutional policies as well as in pro-
viders’ education (Dean et al., 2016). In addition, we regarded systemic microaggressions as those
incidents related to organizational norms and practices, formally or informally defined, which
systemically discriminate a certain minority group (e.g., the non-recognition of lesbian co-moth-
ers’ role, the presence of architectural barriers impeding the acess of functionally diverse peo-
ple, etc.).
The microaggressive themes presented in this study are the result of social stereotypes,
discriminatory mechanisms, power disparities and lack of patient-centeredness. This could be
tackled by training health care professionals with the use of short vignettes that illustrate the
targets´ experience. Appendix A shows a selection of critical incident vignettes based on the
microaggressive themes retrieved in this research through the Critical Incident Technique. They
would make an insightful training tool to render the subtleties of discrimination more visible
showing how scientific results can be used for multiple practical purposes, such as in the sensi-
tization of health providers.
Limitations and future research
The present study focused on the experience of women who self-identified as feminists and/
or activists. The choice to focus on this population was based on studies showing that individuals
actively committed to social causes are usually more sensitive about discrimination, and thus
may be more able to identify microaggressions which are defined as subtle forms of discrim-
ination (Capodilupo et al., 2010; Downing & Roush, 1985). However, the focus on this specific
population and the use of snowball sampling may have restricted our perspective, overlooking
the perception of those who have different backgrounds and levels of sensitivity. Future research
59
PSIQUE • e-ISSN 2183-4806 • Volume XVI • Issue Fascículo 1 • 1
st
january janeiro-30
th
june junho 2020 pp. 44-64
Elena Piccinelli, Sara Martinho, Christin-Melanie Vauclair
should take into consideration a more diverse sample, including participants that are not activ-
ists and possibly using random sampling.
The use of semi-structured interviews is highly useful, but also bears limitations. This type of
interviews creates some difficulties in terms of coding and coding comparisons, because it does
not allow to select a standard unit of coding. Furthermore, as critical incidents take the shape of
remembrances, scholars should pay a special attention to the relationship between human mem-
ory and time: many factors may influence the way interviewees will remember the incident, such
as its valence (positive and negative incidents require different types of cognitive appraisals, and
therefore are diversely stored in memory) and easiness of retrieval since the incident occurred
(Edvardsson & Roos, 2001). We suggest further research using the Critical Incident Technique to
carefully consider these issues.
The present study confirms the existence of microaggressions towards women in the health-
care context but leaves some questions open. Future research should understand the degree to
which men with different intersectional identities are exposed to microaggressions in the health-
care context. This would primarily allow to understand the role of gender identities in the sub-
jective experience of different microaggressions. For example, Dean and colleagues (2016) report
that HIV/AIDS prevention campaigns are often exclusively directed at gay men and almost never
involve lesbian women, representing an environmental microaggression for both homosexual
men and women. Studies aimed at comparing the different experiences of men and women with
intersectional identities should be also conducted in the Portuguese healthcare context. Further-
more, it would be important to identify possible gender differences on the side of the enactors:
do male and female health providers enact microaggressions in the same way? Do they have the
same training needs? Does the gender matching of health providers and patients mitigate the
phenomenon of microaggressions?
Future research should develop a scale to assess the experience of microaggressions in the
healthcare context by individuals with intersectional identities. This would provide a more quan-
tifiable insight into social minority´s experience and how it relates to other outcome variables,
such as treatment adherence and outcomes. In this context, other minoritarian identities (e.g.,
age, weight, social class, educational level) could also be taken in consideration and potentially
confounding variable, such as mental health status, could also be controlled for. Even though it
is unlikely that all our participants suffered from mental health issues, other researchers have
already pointed out the possibility that those who perceive microaggressions might be suffering
from negative affect which makes them more susceptible to perceive ambiguous messages as
microaggressive (e.g., Lilienfeld, 2017). More quantitative research is needed to establish cause
and effect relations and to control for such confounding variables.
60
PSIQUE • e-ISSN 2183-4806 • Volume XVI • Issue Fascículo 1 • 1
st
january janeiro-30
th
june junho 2020 pp. 44-64
Expressões de Microagressões Dirigidas a Mulheres no Contexto do Sistema de Saúde:
Uma Abordagem Baseada em Incidentes Críticos
References
Almond, A. (2017). Measuring racial microaggression in medical practice. Ethnicity and Health, 1-18.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2017.1359497
Beck, J. H., Reitz, J. G., & Weiner, N. (2002). Addressing systemic racial discrimination in employment:
The Health Canada case and implications of legislative change. Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de
politiques, 28(3), 373-394. https://doi.org/10.2307/3552228
Bernard, P., Gervais, S. J., Allen, J., Delmée, A., & Klein, O. (2015). From sex objects to human beings:
Masking sexual body parts and humanization as moderators to womens objectification. Psychology
of women quarterly, 39(4), 432-446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315580125
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2018). Thematic analysis. In P. Liamputtong, Handbook of
research methods in health social sciences (p. 1-18). Springer.
Capodilupo, C., Nadal, K. L., Corman, L., Hamit, S., Lyons, O. B., & Weinberg, A. (2010). The manifestation
of gender microaggressions. In D. Sue, Microaggressions and marginality: Manifestation, dynamics,
and impact (p. 193-216). John Wiley and Sons.
Cole, E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American psychologist, 64(3), 170-180.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014564
Coutinho, C. (2008). A qualidade da investigação educativa de natureza qualitativa: Questões relativas à
fidelidade e validade. Educação Unisinos, 12(1), 5-15.
Cruz, D., Rodriguez, Y., & Mastropaolo, C. (2019). Perceived microaggressions in health care: A measure-
ment study. PLoS ONE, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211620
Dahl, B., Fylkesnes, A. M., Sørlie, V., & Malterud, K. (2013). Lesbian womens experiences with health-
care providers in the birthing context: A meta-ethnography. Midwifery, 29(6), 674-681. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.06.008
Dean, M. A., Victor, E., & Guidry-Grimes, L. (2016). Inhospitable healthcare spaces: Why diversity training
on LGBTQIA issues is not enough. Journal of bioethical inquiry, 13(4), 557-570. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s11673-016-9738-9
Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2000). Aversive racism and selection decisions: 1989 and 1999. Psycholog-
ical Science, 11, 315-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00262
Dovidio, J. F., & Gaertner, S. L. (2004).Aversive racism.In M. P. Zanna (Ed.),Advances in experimental social
psychology, Vol. 36(p. 1-52). Elsevier Academic Press.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(04)36001-6
Downing, N., & Roush, K. (1985). From passive acceptance to active commitment: A model of fem-
inist identity development for women. The Counseling Psychologist, 13(4), 695-709. https://doi.
org/10.1177/0011000085134013
Edvardsson, B., & Roos, I. (2001). Critical incident techniques: Towards a framework for analyzing the
criticality of critical incidents. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 12(3), 251-
268. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005520
Else-Quest, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2016). Intersectionality in Quantitative Psychological Research: I. The-
oretical and Epistemological Issues. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2), 155170. https://doi.
org/10.1177/0361684316629797
Embrick, D. G., Domínguez, S., & Karsak, B. (2017). More than just insults: Rethinking sociology’s con-
tribution to scholarship on racial microaggressions. Sociological Inquiry, 87(2), 193-206. https://doi.
org/10.1111/soin.12184
61
PSIQUE • e-ISSN 2183-4806 • Volume XVI • Issue Fascículo 1 • 1
st
january janeiro-30
th
june junho 2020 pp. 44-64
Elena Piccinelli, Sara Martinho, Christin-Melanie Vauclair
Feagin, J., & Bennefield, Z. (2014). Systemic racism and US health care. Social science & medicine, 103, 7-14.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.006
Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological bulletin, 51(4), 327-358. https://doi.
org/10.1037/h0061470
Franks, P., Fiscella, K., & Meldrum, S. (2005). Racial disparities in the content of primary care office visits.
Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20(7), 599-603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-005-0106-4
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ambivalent sexism. In (Vol. 33, pp. 115-188). Academic Press. In M.
Zanna, Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, p. 155-188). Academic Press. https://doi.
org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80005-8
Gregg, I. (2018). The health care experiences of lesbian women becoming mothers. Nursing for women’s
health, 22(1), 40-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2017.12.003
Gremler, D. D. (2004). The critical Incident technique in service research. Journal of Service Research, 7(1),
65-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670504266138
Herfst, S. L., Van Oudenhoven, J. P., & Timmerman, M. E. (2008). Intercultural effectiveness training in
three Western immigrant countries: A cross-cultural evaluation of critical incidents. International
Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32(1), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2007.10.001
Hobson, W. (2001). Racial discrimination in health care: Interview project. Public Health Seattle & King
Country.
Katz, I., Wackenhut, J., & Hass, R. G. (1986).Racial ambivalence, value duality, and behavior.In J. F. Dovidio
& S. L. Gaertner (Eds.),Prejudice, discrimination, and racism(p. 35–59). Academic Press.
Keller, R. M., & Galgay, C. E. (2010). Microaggressive experiences of people with disabilities. In D. W. Sue,
Microaggressions and marginality: Manifestation, dynamics, and impact, (pp. 241-268).
Kurasaki, K. S. (2000). Intercoder reliability for validating conclusions drawn from open-ended interview
data. Field Methods, 12(3), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X0001200301
Lee, A., & Kanji, Z. (2017). Queering the health care system: Experiences of the lesbian, gay, bisexual,
transgender community. Canadian Journal of Dental Hygiene, 51(2), 80-89.
Lewis, J. A., & Neville, H. A. (2015). Construction and initial validation of the Gendered Racial Micro-
aggressions Scale for Black women. Journal of counseling psychology, 62(2), 289-302. https://doi.
org/10.1037/cou0000062
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2017). Microaggressions: Strong claims, inadequate evidence.Perspectives on psychologi-
cal science,12(1), 138-169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616659391
McConahay, J. B. (1983). Modern racism and modern discrimination: The effects of race, racial attitudes,
and context on simulated hiring decisions.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,9(4), 551-558.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167283094004
Nadal, K., Davidoff, K., Davis, L., Wong, Y., Marshall, D., & McKenzie, V. (2015). A qualitative approach to
intersectional microaggressions: Understanding influences of race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, and
religion. Qualitative Psychology, 2(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000026
Nadal, K., Griffin, K., Wong, Y., Hamit, S., & Rasmus, M. (2014). The impact of racial microaggressions on
mental health: Counseling implications for clients of color. Journal of counseling and development,
92(1), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2014.00130.x
Nadal, K., Whitman, C., Davis, L., Erazo, T., & Davidoff, K. (2016). Microaggressions toward lesbian, gay,
bisexual, transgender, queer, and genderqueer people: A review of the literature. The journal of sex
research, 53(4-5), 488-508. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1142495
62
PSIQUE • e-ISSN 2183-4806 • Volume XVI • Issue Fascículo 1 • 1
st
january janeiro-30
th
june junho 2020 pp. 44-64
Expressões de Microagressões Dirigidas a Mulheres no Contexto do Sistema de Saúde:
Uma Abordagem Baseada em Incidentes Críticos
Oxford University Press. (2019). Intersectionality. Retrieved February 12th, 2019, from English Oxford
Living Dictionaries: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/intersectionality
Pettigrew, T. F. (1989). The nature of modern racism in the United States.Revue Internationale de Psycho-
logie Sociale, 2(3), 291–303.
Robinson, M. E., Riley, J. L., Myers, C. D., Papas, R. K., Wise, E. A., Waxenberg, L. B., & Fillingim, R. B. (2001).
Gender role expectations of pain: Relationship to sex differences in pain. The journal of pain, 2(5), 251-
257. https://doi.org/10.1054/jpai.2001.24551
Saha, S., Beach, M., & Cooper, L. (2008). Patient centeredness, cultural competence and healthcare
quality. Journal of the National Medical Association, 100(11), 1275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0027-
9684(15)31505-4
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., Jinks, C. (2018).
Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality &
quantity, 52(4), 1893-1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
Scullion, P. (1999). Challenging discrimination against disabled patients. Nursing Standard (through 2013),
13(18), 37-40.
Sears, D. O. (1988). Symbolic racism. InEliminating racism(pp. 53-84). Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.
org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0818-6_4
Smith, S. K., & Turell, S. C. (2017). Perceptions of healthcare experiences: Relational and communicative
competencies to improve care for LGBT people. Journal of Social Issues, 73(3), 637-657. https://doi.
org/10.1111/josi.12235
Smith-Oka, V. (2015). Microaggressions and the reproduction of social inequalities in medical encounters
in Mexico. Social Science & Medicine, 143, 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.039
Snyder, C. R., Wang, P. Z., & Truitt, A. R. (2018). Multiracial patient experiences with racial microaggres-
sions in health care settings. Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews, 5(3), 229-238. http://
dx.doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1626
Sue, D. W. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life. Race, gender, and sexual orientation. Hoboken, New
Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern
prejudices.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 199–214.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-
3514.68.2.199
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual review of psychology, 33(1), 1-39. https://
doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245
Taylor, K. (2009). Paternalism, participation and partnershipthe evolution of patient centeredness in the
consultation. Patient education and counseling, 74(2), 150-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.017
Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., & Joly, S. (1995). Neosexism: Plus ça change, plus c’est pareil.Persona-
lity and social psychology bulletin,21(8), 842-849. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295218007
Vissandjée, B., Weinfeld, M., Dupéré, S., & Abdool, S. (2001). Sex, gender, ethnicity, and access to health
care services: Research and policy challenges for immigrant women in Canada. Journal of Internatio-
nal Migration and Integration/Revue de l’integration et de la migration internationale, 2(1), 55-75. ht tps://
doi.org/10.1007/s12134-001-1019-7
Wandner, L. D., Scipio, C. D., Hirsh, A. T., Torres, C. A., & Robinson, M. E. (2012). The perception of pain
in others: How gender, race, and age influence pain expectations. The Journal of Pain, 13(3), 220-227.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2011.10.014
63
PSIQUE • e-ISSN 2183-4806 • Volume XVI • Issue Fascículo 1 • 1
st
january janeiro-30
th
june junho 2020 pp. 44-64
Elena Piccinelli, Sara Martinho, Christin-Melanie Vauclair
Annex A
Critical Incidents
1. Exemplary microaggressive incident towards women in general: Pain Endurance
Maria is a 32-years-old Portuguese woman. She lives in a medium-sized Portuguese town
with her husband, Luís. She is at the beginning of the last week of her pregnancy, expecting her
first child.
After two hours the contractions become more regular and intense and Maria starts to be in
great pain. She and Luis call a doctor who tells them to enter a room and starts examining Maria.
At the end of the examination, the doctor tells Maria that everything is fine with the baby but
that she is not enough dilated yet. She needs to wait more. Noticing the expression of tiredness
and discomfort on Marias face, he continues: “I know it hurts, but you are a mother now. What
did you expect? This is only the beginning. This is a mothers life. You will have to endure a lot of
pain from now on.” Maria feels scared and confused, but she does not know what to answer. She
goes back to the corridor and continues to walk. Once in a while, a health provider checks the
baby heartbeats. Six hours later, she is finally ready to give birth.
2. Exemplary microaggressive incident towards LGB women: Endorsement of heter-
onormativity
Diana is a Portuguese 25-years-old woman who is living and studying in a big Portuguese
city. She moved there recently from a small Portuguese village with her partner Júlia.
One day, Diana decides to go to a gynecologist for a routine check. On the day of the appoint-
ment, Julia accompanies Diana to the clinic. Once arrived, they head to the check-in desk. The
attendant nicely asks for Dianas documents and types something on a computer. Then she looks
at Julia and asks her if she has an appointment, too. Julia answers that she is only accompa-
nying Diana. When the attendant asks what their parental degree is, Julia replies that she is
Dianas girlfriend. The attendant rises an eyebrow, stares at them for some seconds and then
coldly answers: “Well, I am sorry, but you will have to stay in the waiting room. We only allow
family members to enter.” Perplexed, Julia and Diana look at each other, then they silently nod
and go to the waiting room.
3. Exemplary microaggressive incident towards ethnic minority women: Exotization
Carol is a 30-years old woman, who immigrated together with her husband from Brazil to
Portugal 10 years ago and now lives in a big Portuguese city. When Carol discovers to be preg-
nant of her first child, she searches for a doctor to do a first examination.
The doctor kindly welcomes her, and after a few general questions about her medical his-
tory, invites her to lie down on the stretcher for the echography. Before he starts, he looks at her
and says: “You Brazilian people! You are always having kids, aren’t you? You are tireless. Carol
feels very uncomfortable: this is her first pregnancy and she and her husband waited to have a
stable life before deciding to have a child. Lying on the stretcher while the doctor visits her, she
feels vulnerable and powerless. She decides to ignore the doctors’ comment and to focus on the
image on the display of the ultrasound machine.
64
PSIQUE • e-ISSN 2183-4806 • Volume XVI • Issue Fascículo 1 • 1
st
january janeiro-30
th
june junho 2020 pp. 44-64
Expressões de Microagressões Dirigidas a Mulheres no Contexto do Sistema de Saúde:
Uma Abordagem Baseada em Incidentes Críticos
4. Exemplary microaggressive incident towards functionally diverse women: Insensitivity
Irene is a 45-years-old Portuguese woman living in a medium-sized town with her family.
She has been on a wheelchair for five years, because of a car accident that left her paraplegic.
Despite the difficulties to adapt to her condition, Irene has been able to attain a regular and
happy life. Yet, she has experienced some breathing complications recently and her treating phy-
sician refers her to a specialist.
When she enters the doctors’ office, a young doctor welcomes her. He seems surprised about
her condition. He asks her to describe her symptoms and then to lay down on an examination
table. Irene looks at the table and feels confused. It is too high, and it is impossible for her to get
on it on her own. She asks the doctor how she is supposed to get on it. For some seconds, the
doctor seems confused too, then he takes a footstool and places it next to the examination table.
Irene feels angry. She replies: “As I already told you, I am paraplegic. I cannot move my legs.
Ineed help.The doctor seems to understand. He apologizes and calls a technician to lift her. She
knows that there is no other way, but she hates to feel moved like an object.
5. Exemplary microaggressive incident towards patients: Paternalization and lack of sen-
sitivity/ empathy
Joana is a 38-years-old Portuguese woman. For a few weeks now, she is having a rash on
both her arms and legs. She decides to schedule an appointment with a dermatologist to check
the issue.
When Joana enters the dermatologists’ office, he invites her to sit and asks what her problem
is. While Joana answers the question, he keeps typing on his computer. He seems to be more
focused on what he is writing than on what she is saying. Joana lifts a sleeve of her shirt to show
him the rash. Without going any closer to her, he looks at her harm and quickly says: “Yes, I see.
Joana is feeling confused now. Is he paying attention to her? Did he really understand from a
simple, distanced look, what she has? She explains that she has had it for a few weeks now. She
tried to use some moisturizing creams, also went to the pharmacy and asked for a pomade, but it
did not work. The doctor nods while he is typing on his computer. After some minutes, he prints
a prescription and hands it to her. “This is nothing serious. You should pass this pomade twice a
day on the rash and take these pills once a day for two weeks. Do you understand?” Joana feels
that she wants to ask more details about the instructions he gave her, but she feels very uncom-
fortable. “Yes, I think I understood. Can you tell me what is it? What do I have?” she asks. The
dermatologist’s answer sounds very cold: “Nothing to worry about. Just take the medicines and
it will pass.